A federal appeals panel warned a New York City lawyer that relying on artificial‑intelligence tools to draft pleadings in a massive $82 million personal‑injury lawsuit involving the subway system could jeopardize the case. The Second Circuit noted that the attorney’s recent filings appeared to contain AI‑generated language that was inaccurate and potentially misleading, raising concerns about ethical obligations and the duty of competence. The court’s admonition underscores a growing tension between the legal profession’s push to adopt cutting‑edge technology and the strict standards governing courtroom communications. The ruling serves as a cautionary precedent for lawyers nationwide who are experimenting with AI in high‑stakes litigation.
Second Circuit cautions lawyer against AI use in $82 million NYC subway injury case courthousenews.com
