A behind-the-scenes dispute has emerged over a recent decision, with insiders questioning whether the process followed was flawed and whether the outcome was incorrect. Anonymous sources close to the matter have privately expressed frustration, suggesting that key stakeholders believed the approach taken was ineffective. The revelation highlights internal divisions over how the decision was reached and its potential consequences. Details on the specific issue remain unclear, but the criticism signals broader concerns about accountability in the process.
“There was a conversation that the process did not work and they made the wrong decision,’’ a source told The Post.
