Insiders allege that OpenAI and Anthropic exaggerated concerns about AI security risks to influence government regulators, pushing for stricter oversight that could limit competition and safeguard their market positions. Claims suggest the companies framed potential threats as more urgent than they were to secure federal protections and maintain dominance in the rapidly evolving AI industry. Critics argue this approach undermines transparency and could set a precedent for other tech firms prioritizing self-interest over genuine safety concerns. The revelations raise questions about whether AI developers are genuinely advocating for public safety or strategically shaping policy to their advantage.


OpenAI and Anthropic oversold AI security breaches to pressure feds into protecting turf: insiders  New York Post