A controversial practice among some judges has come under scrutiny, with insiders alleging that they circumvent ethical restrictions by renewing their candidacy annually. This tactic reportedly enables them to make continuous donations to political party events without facing disciplinary action. Critics argue the loophole undermines transparency and fairness in judicial conduct. The claims raise questions about whether current regulations effectively prevent conflicts of interest in the judiciary.
Insiders claim judges bypass strict rules by declaring candidacy yearly, allowing them to donate perpetually to party events.
