A new report reveals how a major U.S. city’s approach to addressing homelessness has shifted dramatically in recent years, prioritizing rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing over traditional shelters. Critics argue the strategy has left some vulnerable populations without immediate access to emergency services, while supporters highlight measurable reductions in chronic homelessness. The findings raise broader questions about balancing humanitarian needs with long-term solutions in urban housing crises. The analysis examines both the policy’s intended outcomes and its unintended consequences for those struggling to secure stable housing.